Evidence Vault & Source Index

A) Official & Regulatory Exhibits

These exhibits underpin statements made in the Registry & Records and Timeline of Conduct sections. They are drawn from court systems, regulatory bodies, and law-enforcement.

B) Corporate & IP Filings

This group supports the mapping of entities and marks described in the Registry & Records section. It is based on official registries (Companies House, SunBiz, SEC EDGAR, Australian Business Register, IP India, IP Australia, USPTO, and similar).

C) Marketing, Website & Social Captures

This group covers the public-facing narrative: how Plus Brand / AGUA Plus and precursor ventures presented themselves to consumers, investors, and partners over time.

D) Media Coverage & World Energy / Guatemala Materials

This group focuses on World Energy Research, the Guatemala hydro project, and early public reporting on related investment schemes.

• EV-D1 – New Zealand investigations: scanned and downloaded copies of 2011 New Zealand media coverage examining World Energy Research, the Guatemala hydroelectric project, and investor complaints.
• EV-D2 – Investor complaint narratives: compilations of public statements and reports describing alleged losses, non-payment, or non-delivery of promised returns in connection with World Energy schemes.
• EV-D3 – Promotional documents: project overviews, pitch decks, or site text used to market World Energy investments, including representations regarding capital raised and expected returns.

These materials contain a mixture of reported fact and allegations. They are presented as evidence of what was publicly claimed and contested, not as court findings against every individual involved.

E) Consumer Reviews & Scam-Report Platforms

This group captures the consumer and investor experience layer across different eras of activity (World Energy, By Nature / Bamboo Nutra, Plus Brand / AGUA Plus).

• EV-E1 – 2011 complaint clusters: archived consumer reviews and scam-report forum posts from 2011 relating to energy-investment schemes and associated individuals, focusing on non-payment, non-delivery, and difficulty recovering funds.
• EV-E2 – Nutrition / supplement-era complaints: reviews and complaint threads referencing By Nature / Bamboo Nutra, covering shipping issues, refunds, subscription billing, and product quality.
• EV-E3 – AGUA Plus / Plus Brand consumer reports: later-era consumer comments and posts regarding AGUA Plus products, delivery experiences, and customer service interactions, including any references to previous ventures.

These sources are allegation-level evidence. They are preserved to show patterns and public sentiment, not to substitute for court findings. Where possible, they are cross-checked against official records and internal communications.

F) Internal Communications, Agreements & Payment Materials

This group consists of direct emails, message threads, agreements, and payment records between affected parties and individuals connected to the entities described on this site. Most of these items are restricted due to privacy and legal considerations.

• EV-F1 – Email correspondence sets: curated message chains between investors, partners, and representatives of Plus Brand / AGUA Plus and related entities. These document representations made, timelines promised, explanations given, and positions taken in response to requests for repayment or clarification.
• EV-F2 – Memorandum of Understanding (MoU): a signed Memorandum of Understanding between key parties setting out expectations regarding repayment, cooperation, and steps toward an agreed resolution (2024–2025).
• EV-F3 – Non-binding Investment Repayment & Compensation Agreement: draft non-binding agreement outlining proposed repayment schedules, acknowledgement of amounts, and compensation structures. Used to evidence that repayment and redress were formally canvassed.
• EV-F4 – Payment records: bank statements, transfer confirmations, and accounting summaries showing funds paid into entities or programs connected with the activities mapped on this site, and the gap between amounts paid and amounts recovered.
• EV-F6 – Legal-threat correspondence and non-response record: cease-and-desist correspondence, substantive response, follow-up request for U.S. mail / delivery clarification, and any subsequent non-response, correction, withdrawal, clarification or litigation step.

These materials are generally not published in full. Redacted extracts may be provided to regulators, journalists, or legal counsel upon appropriate request and subject to privacy safeguards.

G) Victim Impact & Loss Summaries

This group underpins the Victim Impact section in the Registry & Records page and pools data from multiple time periods and ventures.

• EV-G1 – Individual statements: anonymised witness statements and personal narratives describing financial loss, health impacts, family strain, and long-term consequences.
• EV-G2 – Aggregated loss tables: spreadsheets and summaries consolidating reported losses across different schemes and eras (energy, nutrition, later AGUA Plus-linked activities), with conservative and high-range estimates.
• EV-G3 – Corroborating documentation: supporting documents such as account statements, prior contracts, and correspondence that corroborate key elements of the statements.

Figures cited publicly (for example, “tens of millions in reported losses”) are grounded in this material but remain subject to independent audit. This site does not claim to have conducted a full forensic accounting.

H) Research Logs & AI-Assisted Analysis

This group documents the structured research process used to connect entities, brands, and representations, including AI-assisted work and manual verification.

• EV-H1 – OSINT & research notes: chronological logs and notes from open-source intelligence work, including domain history, cross-linking of officer names, and tracking of brand reuse across ventures.
• EV-H2 – AI-assisted trace-paths: selected exports of AI chat sessions and trace diagrams used to surface links between corporate records, IP filings, marketing claims, and complaint clusters. Human review is used to separate robust connections from speculative ones.
• EV-H3 – Version history: captures showing how this site, and its understanding of the fact pattern, has evolved as new evidence was added or clarified.

AI outputs are treated as aids to research, not as evidence in themselves. Only where AI-assisted findings are confirmed by primary documents do they inform statements on other pages.

I) Updates, Corrections & Access Requests

This Vault is a living record. New evidence, certified documents, and clarifications will be added as they are obtained.

• 29 May 2026 update: Evidence Vault updated to record the Clark Hill / All-Scratch!® clarification request, warrant / restitution / enforcement-status verification requests, Madison Heights Police FOIA packet, and cease-and-desist / legal-threat correspondence record.
• Corrections: Any party able to provide certified documents showing an inaccuracy in the records or descriptions on this site may submit them for review. Where verified, corrections will be made and timestamped.
• Access by regulators / law-enforcement: Agencies may request direct access to restricted exhibits. Where legally permitted, the complete file set (including hashes) can be supplied.
• Access by journalists / counsel: Redacted packets can be prepared to support responsible reporting or litigation, again subject to privacy and safety considerations.

Important: this site does not claim that every allegation recorded here has been proven in court. Its purpose is to document what has been officially recorded, publicly claimed, and credibly reported, and to preserve the underlying evidence so that regulators, courts, and investigators can make their own determinations.