Case Files & Evidence Log
This page lists the core document classes and evidence sets maintained in relation to Chad Eugene Willis, Plus Brand Industries Inc., Agua Plus and associated entities. It is a high-level index only — individual files, dates, parties and identifiers are kept in a controlled archive and released selectively to regulators, law-enforcement, legal representatives, journalists and verified victims on request.
Where specific matters are not finally adjudicated, they are described as allegations or reported conduct, with the underlying source material preserved in the archive.
Each category contains multiple documents, captures or data streams; only headings are shown here.
All items are cross-indexed by date, jurisdiction, entity, counterparty and topic to allow regulators and investigators to reconstruct complete sequences of conduct across multiple projects and years.
- Certified copies of the Oakland County, Michigan felony case file (case reference including 04-197988-FH) and associated docket entries.
- Judgment and sentencing materials confirming felony convictions arising from false pretences / related conduct, together with the linked restitution orders originally calculated at approximately US$188,000 and later increased to approximately US$500,000 plus accruing interest.
- Michigan Department of Insurance & Financial Services (DIFS) Order of Prohibition #06-4287 – lifetime prohibition in specified financial / insurance activities, unless expressly lifted in writing by the Commissioner.
- Related enforcement documentation, including the Mortgage Highway, LLC cease-and-desist as an unlicensed residential mortgage company controlled by Chad Eugene Willis.
Use: establishes prior criminal history, standing regulatory prohibition and the scale of court-ordered restitution, which is central to risk, KYC and suitability assessments.
- Email and written responses from court, clerk and sheriff / enforcement departments regarding restitution liabilities and warrant indicators, including confirmation that the restitution orders referenced above remain unsatisfied / outstanding as at the most recent responses.
- Call notes and confirmation logs documenting attempts to verify status directly with official offices (dates, times, officers spoken to, reference numbers where provided).
- Internal reconciliation sheets comparing official responses with portal displays and historic payment records, to ensure that public statements regarding unpaid restitution and any active warrant signals are anchored to documented agency feedback.
Use: supports statements about outstanding restitution and enforcement posture by referencing direct written communications and logs, rather than relying solely on snapshot portal screens.
- Full copies of formal submissions lodged in the week of 8–10 December 2025 to key U.S. regulators and authorities, including (but not limited to) the SEC, FTC, FCC, IRS-CI, and DOJ, together with any relevant state-level agencies.
-
Attachments and annexures provided with those filings, including summaries of:
- Felony record and Order of Prohibition #06-4287.
- Outstanding restitution orders (US$188k and US$500k tranches plus interest) and enforcement status as at filing.
- Historical schemes, investor losses and the ongoing Plus Brand / Agua Plus structures and fundraising narratives.
- Email confirmations, intake references and acknowledgement receipts where provided by each agency, logged against date / time and content of submission.
Use: shows that the full record – including unsatisfied restitution and ongoing conduct concerns – has been formally escalated to multiple regulators, with a coherent evidentiary pack attached for each filing.
- Non-binding repayment and compensation framework between a complainant and core principals associated with Plus Brand / Agua Plus (2025, party names redacted in public index).
- Memorandum of understanding between a complainant and a senior associate of Chad Eugene Willis outlining profit-share, settlement triggers and distribution of proceeds (2025, redacted in public index).
- Ancillary documents (draft term sheets, email confirmations, messaging excerpts) evidencing the intent and promises made under these frameworks.
Use: demonstrates structured promises of repayment / participation given to counterparties and provides baselines against which subsequent conduct can be assessed.
- Agreements, notes and pitch materials relating to historic investment schemes and funding arrangements, including energy projects, nutrition / supplement ventures and beverage brands.
- Documentation of promissory-note style structures, informal “friends and family” capital raises, licensing-linked participation and similar arrangements.
Use: supports analysis of how investment-style structures were used over time in light of existing regulatory prohibitions.
- Curated sets of emails between principals and affected counterparties spanning multiple projects and years (2009–2025; message bodies redacted in public index).
- Messaging-app conversations (e.g. chat threads) involving senior personnel, including discussions about funding, settlements, investor relations and product claims.
- Logged summaries of key voice or video calls where commitments, explanations or representations were made.
Use: establishes patterns of assurance, delay, commitment, non-payment and narrative management.
- Chronological log of formal notices, demands and follow-up messages issued to principals and associates over recent years.
- Recorded instances of non-response, ghosting or refusal to engage after receipt of detailed concerns or structured settlement proposals.
Use: evidences the pattern of avoiding structured resolution while continuing to operate and promote new ventures.
- Archived copies of independent consumer-complaint sites, forum threads and watchdog reports dating back to approximately 2009, covering energy projects, investment schemes and beverage ventures.
- Consolidated dossiers prepared from multiple unrelated complainants describing similar non-payment, delay and misrepresentation patterns.
Use: shows that concerns about conduct are long-standing and multi-project, not limited to a single disgruntled counterparty.
- Date-stamped captures of official Plus Brand / Agua Plus websites, including historic investor, licensing and program pages that have since been removed or substantially altered.
- Screenshots and archives of social-media channels showing highly asymmetric engagement patterns, rebranding moves and follower-count anomalies.
- Examples of persona-building media pieces (e.g. flattering interviews, “visionary” profiles) contrasted with underlying factual performance and legal history.
Use: documents the deliberate curation of public image and the erosion / disappearance of negative search results over time.
- Marketing copy, web pages and pitch materials describing “All-Scratch” as a patented or patent-protected technology.
- Independent patent-search summaries across U.S. and selected international databases showing no matching granted patent or published application consistent with those claims.
- Formal written requests to Plus Brand / Agua Plus for patent evidence, and logs of their lack of response to date.
Use: underpins the designation of the patent narrative as an unsubstantiated claim unless and until primary documentation is produced.
- Captures of product pages, labels and promotional materials for beverages and supplements marketed with weight-loss, energy, recovery, immune or “clarity”-style benefits.
- Comparative notes against relevant regulatory guidance and industry standards for advertising and health claims.
- Instances where strong outcome or “works for everyone” style claims are made without accompanying clinical evidence or references.
Use: provides context for regulators or advertising-standards bodies assessing whether claims are potentially misleading or non-compliant.
- Cross-project timelines mapping entities, deals, complaints, regulatory events and public rebrands over approximately 25 years.
- Pattern summaries highlighting recurring tactics (investment structures, reputation-laundering, proxy intermediaries, non-payment cycles, jurisdiction hopping, etc.).
- Link-maps showing relationships between individuals, entities, domains, trademarks and campaigns.
Use: gives regulators, investigators and journalists a single, structured overview of behaviour that would otherwise be fragmented across many jurisdictions and time periods.
- Internal log specifying which materials are routinely provided to regulators and law-enforcement, and under what conditions more sensitive files (e.g. full agreements, unredacted communications) are released.
- Procedures for victim verification and controlled sharing of relevant material to assist individual claims, class-action exploration or media investigation.
Use: ensures that sensitive materials are handled securely while still enabling effective oversight, enforcement and journalistic scrutiny.
Note: This index is intentionally high-level. It confirms that specific classes of evidence exist, without exposing private identifiers, confidential settlement terms or the personal data of complainants. Detailed material is reserved for appropriate authorities and bona fide requestors.